Robin Tsui from State Street Investment Management speaks to Drew Meredith at The Inside Network’s Alternatives Symposium in the Blue Mountains, NSW on how rate cuts and risk shape the case for gold.
Blog
-

Alternatives Symposium 2025: INBrief with Lev Margolin from System Capital
Lev Margolin from System Capital speaks to Drew Meredith at The Inside Network’s Alternatives Symposium in the Blue Mountains, NSW on flexible exposure and the future of absolute returns.
-

Alternatives Symposium 2025: INBrief with Greg Miles from MA Financial
Greg Miles from MA Financial speaks to Drew Meredith at The Inside Network’s Alternatives Symposium in the Blue Mountains, NSW on what the next decade looks like for retail real estate.
-

Alternatives Symposium 2025: INBrief with Bryan Brown from Fortitude Investment Partners
Bryan Brown from Fortitude Investment Partners speaks to Drew Meredith at The Inside Network’s Alternatives Symposium in the Blue Mountains, NSW on private equity in the lower mid-market: Fortitude’s founder-focused edge.
-

Building Providend: A journey of purpose, people and principles
When Chris Tan co-founded Providend Wealth in 2001, Singapore’s financial advisory industry was barely taking shape. The Financial Advisers Act had not yet been implemented, and the idea of a “fee-only” advisory model, one that separated advice from product sales was unheard of. Yet, on September 11, 2001, as the world witnessed tragedy unfold in New York, a small but momentous event was also taking place in Singapore: Tan and his partner signed a tenancy agreement that marked the official birth of Providend.
I still remember going home after signing that lease and seeing the planes crash into the World Trade Center,” recalls Tan. “We thought it was a movie. It was surreal.”
That day became symbolic of what lay ahead – a volatile journey defined by uncertainty, courage, and conviction.
Tan entered the financial industry in 1998, starting at an insurance company because, as he puts it, “that was the only way to be a financial adviser in Singapore.” He quickly rose through the ranks, earning over S$200,000 in commissions by his third year. Yet, despite the success, he felt an emptiness.
“I wanted to help people plan their finances, not just sell insurance,” Tan says. The turning point came during a meeting with a long-time client who said, “Chris, I always buy something from you when you come. But surely one day, I won’t need any more insurance.”
That moment of uncomfortable truth hit hard. “I realised he wasn’t buying because he needed it – he was buying to support me,” says Tan. “I felt guilty. That was when I knew I had to change.”
Leaving behind a lucrative income and the security of an established career, Tan took a leap of faith. With his co-founder, he decided to build Singapore’s fee-only advisory firm, grounded in independence, integrity, and a belief that true financial advice should be free of product bias.
What followed, however, was not the overnight success story some might imagine. Providend spent its first year without a licence because the Singapore government delayed implementing the Financial Advisers Act after 9/11. The founders survived on savings and sheer conviction. “We didn’t know what we didn’t know,” Tan laughs. “It was naively stupid – but also beautifully brave.”
For nearly two decades, Providend grew slowly and steadily, operating as a niche player in a commission-driven industry. “Up until 2018, our AUM was about S$283 million,” Tan shares. “It was only in the last five years that we experienced exponential growth.”
That growth, however, was built on two decades of groundwork – values, culture, and trust.
Today, Providend manages S$1.56 billion in assets (as of August 2025) and employs around 70 staff across two entities: its core wealth advisory firm and an insurance specialist arm.
Yet Tan is the first to downplay the word “success.” “It took 20 years of grind before the growth came,” he says. “The last five years were exponential, but they were built on the first twenty of perseverance.”
What kept Tan and his founding team together through the tough years was what he calls a “leadership burden.”
“All my founding members were successful commission-based advisers who gave up everything to join me,” he says. “For many years, they earned far less than before. Yet they stayed. They believed in the vision.”
He speaks with deep gratitude for his team. “We never once quarrelled about money, leadership, or recognition. They submitted to my leadership, even though I was the youngest and least experienced. And when I made mistakes – and there were many – they never said, ‘We told you so.’”
That trust, he says, is sacred. “I’ve always carried a leadership burden – to make sure that the firm thrives, that the team is rewarded, and that the families behind each team member are taken care of. Because when we pursue our dreams, our families pay the price.”
Providend’s philosophy, “helping people make life decisions before financial decisions,” is deeply intertwined with Tan’s worldview. He calls it the philosophy of sufficiency, a belief that financial freedom is not about having more, but about knowing what is enough. “There is a trade-off in life,” he says. “We help our clients define what matters most, and then arrange their finances to support those life goals.”
Looking back, Tan sees leadership as a mirror. “When I started, I was very confident, maybe even arrogant,” he admits. “I believed that if I worked hard, everything would go my way. But over time, I learned that life doesn’t always reward effort. You can do your best and still not get the result you want.”
Failure, he says, taught him humility. “I like myself better now than 20 years ago,” he smiles. “I’m more grounded, more grateful.”
Asked what advice he’d give his 20-year-old self, Tan pauses. “Honestly, I wouldn’t change anything. Every mistake shaped me. If I told my younger self to ‘be humble,’ I wouldn’t have understood it. You can only understand humility after failure.”
As technology reshapes every aspect of financial services, Tan is clear-eyed about what it can – and cannot – replace.
“With AI today, you can generate a financial plan or a trust document,” he says. “If our value lies only in number-crunching or recommending products, then yes, AI will replace us.”
But human advisers, he insists, have something no algorithm can replicate: empathy.
“Advisers must be skilled in understanding people, what motivates them, what they value, what gives them purpose,” says Tan. “Empathy requires relationship, and bots cannot build relationships.”
He draws inspiration from the Japanese concept of ikigai, a reason for being. “A good life,” Tan says, “is living in a place you belong, with people you love, doing the right work, on purpose.” Helping clients discover that is the true future of advice.
Tan sees the next generation of advisers needing a blend of technical knowledge and emotional intelligence. “We still need to understand the math. But we must also become better listeners, listening not just to words, but to tone, emotions, and context.”
He’s training his team in this human-centred approach, focusing on “discovery questions” that help clients gain clarity about themselves, not just their money. “The best questions aren’t for us, they’re for the client,” Tan says.
Now in his mid-50s, Tan is turning his focus to succession – something he’s been planning intentionally for the past five years. “It’s a 10-year plan,” Tan explains. “We’re working on both leadership and ownership transition.”
Rather than selling Providend to a larger financial institution, Tan and his founding partners are determined to keep it employee-owned. “It may not give us the best buyout, but it’s the best thing for our clients and our legacy,” he says. “Our own retirement money is with the firm, so we want to make sure it remains in safe, trusted hands.”
By the age of 60, Tan hopes to step back from the business. “I want to have the option to retire from financial services and move into something that aligns with my passions, probably life coaching. That’s where my heart is.”
From a small unlicensed startup in 2001 to one of Singapore’s most respected independent advisory firms, Chris Tan’s journey with Providend is a testament to conviction and character.
His story isn’t one of instant success, but of quiet persistence, faith in people, and the courage to lead differently.
“I’ve always said I’ll be the last man standing,” Tan reflects. “If things fail, I’ll be the last one out the door, because leadership is not about privilege, it’s about responsibility.”
As Providend looks to its future, Tan’s influence will remain, woven into the firm’s DNA of authenticity, empathy, and purpose. For him, the measure of success has never been assets under management or awards won, but lives changed, both those of the firm’s clients and his team.
“I’m just grateful,” he says simply. “Grateful that after all the mistakes and all the years, we’re still here – and we’re still making a difference.”
Chris Tan is a co-founder at Providend Wealth, based in Singapore. You can meet Chris at the upcoming The Inside Network’s INASIA: Investment Leaders Forum.
-

Golden future: How the precious metal is reasserting its place in portfolios
“We are the largest gold-backed ETF provider in the world,” said Robin Tsui, APAC gold strategist and vice-president at State Street Investment Management at The Inside Network’s recent Alternatives Symposium. “And we’ve been telling clients for the last five years, you’ve got to look at gold as a single asset class.”
Tsui’s remarks come at a time when gold is trading at historically high levels. “When we published our mid-year outlook in June, the gold price was around US$3,200 an ounce,” he said. “We still believed it would remain in a higher-for-longer price regime. At US$3,650 now, I think it’s safe to say we were correct.”
Behind that performance are a series of structural forces reshaping demand. “Gold is no longer just a commodity sitting inside a broad-based basket,” Tsui argued. “Its behaviour, correlations and performance have decoupled from that framework. It’s a strategic asset in its own right.”
The first and most visible driver has been flows into exchange-traded products. “We track 160 gold-backed ETFs globally,” he said. “What we’ve seen is a return of strong inflows, particularly since the first half of this year.” As of August, investors had added 550 tonnes to ETFs. “That’s the third-highest inflow year on record, just behind Covid and the GFC,” he noted.
These inflows, Tsui said, are not just tactical. “Across institutional, retail and financial advisers, the sentiment is very strong,” he said. “The inflows are tightening supply, and ETFs are fully backed by physical gold. That dynamic is very supportive of price.”
The second key driver is physical demand, especially in Asia. “We’ve studied the behaviour of retail gold buyers, and there’s been no significant slowdown in demand despite the price doubling since Covid,” Tsui said. “Bars and coins are long-term holdings. In Asia, they’re strategic assets.”
He was particularly struck by the generational shift underway. “The younger generation in China, Hong Kong and Japan have become increasingly interested in gold,” he said. “Five years ago you’d have laughed if I’d said that. But now, they see it as a way to diversify when equities are underperforming and currencies are depreciating.”
Central banks represent the third and perhaps most powerful tailwind. “They’ve been buying at a historic pace,” Tsui said. “Over the last three years, central banks have purchased around 1,000 tonnes per year. That’s about one-third of total mine supply.”
This trend, he said, is driven by geopolitics and reserve rebalancing. “The sanctions from the US have pushed countries like China, India, Poland and Turkey to diversify away from the dollar,” Tsui said. “They are rotating into gold to reduce exposure.”
“China’s gold reserves have gone from 2 per cent of total reserves to 6 per cent in just three years,” he noted. “If they target 20 per cent, which is the global central bank average, it could take another eight years of consistent buying. That’s a powerful source of demand.”
A fourth force supporting the price is de-dollarisation, linked to the global debt build-up. “We’ve spoken with at least five Asian central banks this year,” said Tsui. “They’re concerned about holding US assets and have been asking us how to get exposure to gold-backed ETFs. That’s new. Historically, they only bought physical gold.”
The direction of monetary policy adds yet another tailwind. “We expected three rate cuts this year when many were only pricing-in one,” he said. “Rate cuts have historically been very beneficial for gold. Over the last 55 years, every time the Fed cuts rates, gold goes up.”
There is also a growing dislocation between gold and traditional safe havens. “Historically, gold and US Treasuries were positively correlated,” Tsui explained. “That’s broken down. The correlation is now deeply negative. Gold is outperforming both the dollar and Treasuries as a safe haven.”
For clients concerned about systemic risk, Tsui believes gold offers something governments cannot. “Gold has moved up in the safe-haven hierarchy,” he said. “Clients are increasingly bearish on the dollar and concerned about the independence of the Fed. Gold’s appeal is precisely that it’s not tied to any government.”
Looking ahead, the outlook remains strong. “We’re confident gold will close in on US$3,900 by year-end,” he said (at time of publication, it has pushed through US$4,000 an ounce). “Q4 has strong seasonal support from Indian and Chinese demand, and portfolio rebalancing also plays a role.”
From a portfolio construction perspective, Tsui sees gold as a risk-adjusted-return enhancer. “We’ve back-tested gold allocations of zero to ten percent,” he said. “The results are clear. Gold increases risk-adjusted return, reduces maximum drawdown, and this year, you’ve had the bonus of a 40 per cent return.”
-

Crafting the right investment philosophy for advice practices
As regulation intensifies and client expectations outpace the adaptability of most advice businesses, firms must reimagine not only how they deliver financial guidance but how they construct the investment infrastructure that supports it. Speaking at the Investment Leaders Forum INZ in Queenstown, Chris Lioutas, co-CEO of Genium Investment Partners, delivered a clear directive: advice practices must build their investment capability with clarity, alignment and scale, or risk becoming irrelevant.
“Where we’ve come from and where we are now are worlds apart,” Lioutas began. “In the traditional advice practice, investment management was stitched together from house ratings, internal models and a little rebalancing. Clients were mostly pre-retirees or retirees, focused on income and capital preservation, and relatively insensitive to fees.” That model, he explained, has been left behind by a changing environment.
Today’s clients are digital natives, investment-aware and fee-conscious. They want transparency in pricing, tangible outcomes like tax-efficiency and performance reporting, and interfaces that reflect their expectations of modern service delivery. “It is no longer enough to be technically sound,” Lioutas said. “The way you deliver investment outcomes has to align with your client’s values. This is about identity and positioning, not just process,” he said.
The modern adviser, then, faces a fundamental question: how should investment capability be built? Lioutas outlined three viable models for delivering this capability; in-house, partially outsourced and fully outsourced, and stressed that none are inherently right or wrong. The decision must reflect each business’ values, strengths and goals.
An in-house model offers complete control. It allows advisers to build portfolios that match their philosophy and client needs with precision. However, it comes at a significant cost. “You are wearing every hat,” Lioutas said. “Research, governance, compliance, portfolio updates. It is intensely time-consuming, and scalability becomes an uphill battle, especially as adviser numbers continue to decline while demand increases.”
A partial outsourcing model offers a middle path. Firms may adopt model portfolios, bring in investment research partners or share governance responsibilities. This provides some relief from operational pressure, but does not eliminate it. “It gives you some time back and more rigour in your processes,” Lioutas noted, “but you still have to deal with paperwork, oversight and accountability. It is only a partial solution.”
Fully outsourced investment capability is, by contrast, the most scalable and efficient. It enables firms to partner with a specialist to handle the entire investment function. “That allows the adviser to focus on what they do best, strategy and client relationships,” Lioutas said. The trade-off is a perceived loss of control, and for some, a sense of disconnection from their value proposition. “Fee-layering and identity concerns are valid, but with the right partner, they are manageable,” he added.
The decision should never be made on short-term convenience, Lioutas warned. “Adopting a model because someone said SMAs are the only path, or because it solves a problem today, is risky. You need to think in decades, not quarters. Will this decision still serve your business and your clients in ten years?”
Once the structure is selected, the next task is to define a coherent investment proposition. According to Lioutas, that must begin with the advice philosophy. “This is about how you deliver advice and how that ties to your investment approach. If there is misalignment, clients will feel it and outcomes will suffer,” he said.
Advisers must also deeply understand their client base. How much personalisation do they expect? Do they want engagement or automation? What kind of reporting or digital experience are they seeking? “Your client’s preferences should shape every decision you make in building your capability. Ignoring these insights results in disconnect and lost trust,” Lioutas said.
A balancing act exists between efficiency and control. Too much of the former and you lose your distinctive edge; too much of the latter and you throttle your capacity to grow. “Leaning too far in either direction will stunt your practice. There is an optimal middle ground that varies for every business,” he said.
Compliance and risk management must be embedded from day one, not bolted-on later. Technology needs to support not just client reporting, but also rebalancing, governance and operational integrity. Pricing also matters. “Your investment proposition must be sustainable. If your margins are not viable, none of this will work long-term,” Lioutas cautioned.
Looking ahead, Lioutas sketched a clear picture of the investment partner of the future. The right partner will integrate seamlessly into an advice business, aligning with its philosophy, supporting the client experience and adapting to the delivery model rather than forcing structural change. “They should enhance scale without sacrificing quality,” he said. “And they must bring transparency, governance and flexibility. They are not a supplier. They are a partner in every sense”.
Such a partner anticipates problems before they arise, brings deep research to the table, and elevates the adviser’s value in the eyes of the client. “They are not there to replace you. They make you more visible, more scalable and more impactful. That is what makes them a strategic asset, not a cost centre,” he said.
For Lioutas, investment capability should never be an afterthought. It is not just a mechanism for delivering portfolio outcomes, it is central to how an advice business is perceived, how it operates, and whether it thrives in a world of accelerating change. “The investment partner you choose today will shape your practice for the next decade,” he concluded. “Get it right, and you turn a functional decision into your biggest competitive advantage”.
-

Daily Market Update: 09 October 2025
Australian market dips as tech and retail weigh
The S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) edged down 9.2 points, or 0.1 per cent, with seven of eleven sectors closing lower as weakness in consumer discretionary and technology stocks outweighed gains in healthcare. Among retail names, Wesfarmers Limited (ASX: WES) declined 2.2 per cent, while JB Hi-Fi Limited (ASX: JBH), Myer Holdings Limited (ASX: MYR), Eagers Automotive Limited (ASX: APE), and Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ASX: ALL) all posted losses. Gold miners also faced selling pressure as bullion briefly breached US$4000 per ounce, leading to declines in Vault Minerals Limited (ASX: VLT), Perseus Mining Limited (ASX: PRU) and Greatland Gold plc (ASX: GGP).Healthcare and individual movers buck the trend
Healthcare stocks helped offset broader losses, led by Mesoblast Limited (ASX: MSB), which jumped 9.4 per cent following a strong update on US revenues for its Ryoncil therapy. Gains were also seen in ResMed Inc (ASX: RMD), Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited (ASX: TLX), Pro Medicus Limited (ASX: PME), Sigma Healthcare Limited (ASX: SIG), and Cochlear Limited (ASX: COH). Among notable movers, James Hardie Industries plc (ASX: JHX) surged 9.9 per cent after reporting better-than-expected second-quarter sales, while Apiam Animal Health Limited (ASX: AHX) climbed 6.7 per cent after confirming due diligence progress with private equity firm Adamantem. DroneShield Limited (ASX: DRO) rose 7.8 per cent on software enhancements, and NRW Holdings Limited (ASX: NWH) added 3 per cent after upgrading guidance and completing an acquisition.US tech stocks drive global momentum
Global markets found support from renewed tech optimism, with the S&P 500 Index (NYSE: SPX) rising 0.6 per cent, the Nasdaq Composite Index (NASDAQ: IXIC) advancing 1.1 per cent, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (NYSE: DJI) finishing flat. Gains were driven by AI-linked stocks including Advanced Micro Devices Inc (NASDAQ: AMD), which rallied 11.3 per cent amid OpenAI deal momentum, alongside strength in Micron Technology Inc (NASDAQ: MU), Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA), Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) and Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN). The release of the latest Federal Reserve minutes reinforced expectations of further rate cuts amid persistent inflation and a fragile labour market, while Cisco Systems Inc (NASDAQ: CSCO) advanced on the launch of a new AI chip.Australian Indices Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % ASX 200 -0.1 1.1 1.3 5.2 12.8 Financials 0.1 1.4 1.5 3.5 22.2 Resources -0.2 2.5 5.6 19.3 14.9 Information Technology -0.6 -0.7 -0.2 3.3 19.2 Global Indices Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % US 500 0.6 0.4 3.3 7.0 19.4 Europe -0.2 0.1 2.2 2.9 20.9 Japan -0.2 2.5 1.2 10.8 20.3 China top 50 -1.1 0.1 4.9 11.1 34.8 India top 50 0.0 0.9 0.3 -6.1 -3.3 Fixed Interest Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % Australian Treasury Bond 0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.5 4.0 Australian Corporate Bond 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.8 4.9 US Treasury 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.3 2.8 Cash 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 4.2 Commodities & Crypto Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % Gold 2.1 3.1 9.4 18.6 54.7 Silver 0.5 2.8 17.5 30.1 60.1 Crude Oil 0.6 -0.1 -0.2 -5.6 -3.8 Bitcoin -1.8 4.7 8.6 11.6 100.8 -

Daily Market Update: 08 October 2025
Australian market downturn
The Australian share market saw a broad sell‑off on Tuesday, with the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) dropping 24.6 points to 8,956.8, or about 0.3 per cent, and the All Ordinaries (ASX: XAO) sliding by a similar margin. All sectors except one closed lower, led by declines in the consumer discretionary and communication services segments. Retailers including Breville (ASX: BRG) fell sharply (‑4.5 per cent), while Wesfarmers Limited (ASX: WES) and Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ASX: ALL) both slipped around 1.3 per cent. The communications sector saw REA Group Limited (ASX: REA) decline 2.1 per cent, Seek Limited (ASX: SEK) drop 1.4 per cent, and Car Group Limited (ASX: CAR) fall 2.9 per cent. In financials, Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) edged down 0.4 per cent, whereas ASX Limited (ASX: ASX) declined 1.4 per cent after receiving regulatory approval for direct competition from Cboe Australia. In contrast, gold and related miners held firm: Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM / ASX exposure via gold miners) rose modestly as gold prices surged globally. Among individual movers, Web Travel (ASX: WEB) jumped 3 per cent on positive earnings guidance, DroneShield Limited (ASX: DRO) fell 3.7 per cent after outlining a $13 million R&D spend, and St Barbara Limited (ASX: SBM) plunged 11 per cent following a fresh $58 million capital raising. Meanwhile, sporting‑club stock Brisbane Broncos (ASX: BNB) collapsed 16.4 per cent after recent sharp gains were unwound by profit‑taking.US market pullback amid uncertainty
In the US, equities reversed earlier gains as investors grappled with risks from a continuing federal government shutdown and uneven corporate results. The S&P 500 Index (NYSE: SPX) fell about 0.4 per cent, the Nasdaq Composite Index (NASDAQ: IXIC) declined roughly 0.7 per cent, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) slid as well, dragged lower by weakness in sectors such as cloud computing. Technology and AI names showed mixed performance: Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) was under pressure after weak cloud margin guidance, Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) dropped 4.4 per cent after unveiling a lower‑cost Model Y, and Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) tumbled 7.6 per cent following a supplier fire. Some bright spots included Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD), which gained on news of an AI deal, and IBM (NYSE: IBM) benefiting from AI partnerships. Safe havens like gold rallied strongly, with futures crossing the $4,000 mark, reflecting heightened demand amid economic and policy uncertainty.Australian Indices Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % ASX 200 -0.3 1.5 1.4 5.7 13.4 Financials 0.1 1.6 1.1 4.0 23.0 Resources 0.2 1.5 5.1 19.1 12.8 Information Technology -1.0 0.1 -0.2 4.4 22.1 Global Indices Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % US 500 -0.4 1.0 3.1 6.8 20.4 Europe -0.3 1.8 2.8 4.0 21.9 Japan -0.1 4.0 4.2 12.6 21.3 China top 50 0.4 -0.1 5.1 12.0 32.3 India top 50 0.5 1.8 -0.3 -6.1 -3.7 Fixed Interest Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % Australian Treasury Bond -0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 4.0 Australian Corporate Bond -0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 4.9 US Treasury 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.1 2.8 Cash 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 4.2 Commodities & Crypto Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % Gold 0.7 3.4 8.8 17.2 51.5 Silver -0.1 5.3 18.1 31.7 57.1 Crude Oil -1.1 0.4 -5.1 -4.3 Bitcoin 0.8 9.8 11.6 13.2 100.9 -

Daily Market Update: 07 October 2025
Australian market
The S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) slipped 0.1 per cent (–6 points) to close at 8,981.4, after earlier rising above the August 21 record of 9,019.1. The rally faltered amid a relatively subdued session and partial public holiday in parts of the country. Tech names led the retreat, with Iress Limited (ASX: IRE) down 2.3 per cent and WiseTech Global Limited (ASX: WTC) off 2.2 per cent, while only five of the 11 ASX sectors closed in the green.Australian market — sector‑level drivers
Miners and utilities outperformed, cushioning the broader market weakness. Lynas Rare Earths Limited (ASX: LYC) surged ~7 per cent on reports of early China–Malaysia processing talks, reaching its highest since 2011. Strong gold and copper prices bolstered the likes of Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM) (jumping ~2.3 per cent), Northern Star Resources Limited (ASX: NST) and Evolution Mining Limited (ASX: EVN). On the copper side, Sandfire Resources Limited (ASX: SFR) rose ~4 per cent and Kincora Copper Limited (ASX: KCC) climbed ~5.5 per cent amid supply disruption concerns. Energy stocks also gained, with Ampol Limited (ASX: ALD) up 0.6 per cent and Woodside Energy Group Limited (ASX: WDS) up 0.7 per cent, supported by OPEC+’s modest production increase. In financials, ANZ Banking Group Limited (ASX: ANZ) and Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) slid, while National Australia Bank Limited (ASX: NAB) and Westpac Banking Corporation (ASX: WBC) edged higher.Global market outlook
Overseas, U.S. markets extended gains despite the government shutdown, with the S&P 500 Index and Nasdaq‑100 Index both registering fresh record closes. The rally was fuelled by AI‑driven dealmaking, particularly Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD), which climbed sharply on news of a multiyear chip supply agreement with OpenAI. Investors appeared to look past near‑term disruption, focusing instead on strong corporate earnings and the likelihood of further Federal Reserve rate cuts.Australian Indices Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % ASX 200 -0.1 1.3 1.4 5.5 13.0 Financials -0.4 1.2 1.2 4.0 23.4 Resources 0.7 1.5 4.5 17.6 10.2 Information Technology -1.1 2.2 1.9 6.9 24.0 Global Indices Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % US 500 0.4 0.4 2.9 6.4 22.0 Europe 0.0 2.3 3.4 4.5 23.1 Japan 1.5 1.2 2.6 8.7 20.4 China top 50 -0.7 1.3 6.3 14.0 20.3 India top 50 0.7 0.5 -0.8 -6.5 -2.7 Fixed Interest Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % Australian Treasury Bond -0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.2 Australian Corporate Bond 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 5.2 US Treasury -0.2 0.7 0.9 2.1 2.9 Cash 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 4.2 Commodities & Crypto Daily % Weekly % 1 Month % 3 Month % 1 Year % Gold 2.0 1.1 7.3 15.6 50.1 Silver 2.8 1.0 16.0 27.9 52.2 Crude Oil 1.3 -4.0 -0.9 -5.0 -10.0 Bitcoin 2.6 8.5 11.6 14.2 98.0
